[CRTech] Christian Radio Tech [MSG 83306]
[Thread Prev] [-- Thread Index --] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [-- Date Index --] [Date Next]
Re: Operation Logs
To: CRTech <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: Re: Operation Logs
From: Mark Croom <markc@newmail.kinshipradio.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 16:29:54 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=newmail-kinshipradio-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Vbc/XGwNOpo8wigTF3jX7Gt23NJ4l3aF2dzCHc2e3S0=; b=MTT+qlQq4xE0V4S/XfRrcTYRGK0qKz6HNCOyUzBSleaDfZO6iG3W7qu5Qba2IeF//d yyLzK9TQNRWT/GWEupOBE+g6HuwYRmwUXKneVGY0rpSVep927goL7BpLk1uZlSMmGh8k MwH7Z7mOh/yL1fpCp3F7g40XHiSZP7Z5xyWgeAFPjbsQ96C1lDHMiz1o/1G2Rt0iq/az Gwn5H1uHHm+xb8/mquZNzHcjcuGvBnbWhx72JUYcBdOXEiGoBUSeffnkdfQACepq0TZm z91iKnp3EztqSRXktFs/2hjEGR6xIBtmFiELfxBad2RYmdqW8NMT36rGiIGrME/U7eH2 u3Gw==
In-reply-to: <BYAPR08MB4424704841BECC47F4F22F7BB5460@BYAPR08MB4424.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAB42DVo4ft8u2Ci9qQss0LU9h5Z-DGOUiecUHZ=KAWr6VkAh7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAPQBvqriS4H72irV18yf7bK84YakU4A4=PkWaVh-Z-BJBsnKmw@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR08MB4424704841BECC47F4F22F7BB5460@BYAPR08MB4424.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
If I walked in to inspect, I would have ZERO problems with that, provided the logs are signed and dated showing evidence of review as required.

I really like to see things like required EAS RWT/RMT entries circled or highlighted. That tells me the logs were really reviewed. HOWEVER if the Chief Operator shows me that everything is really present on that signed/dated log with no highlights or other callouts for required entries I'm fine with that.

Mark
MN


On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Mike Shane <mshane@salemomaha.com> wrote:

Would it be correct, then, to print the log, review it, sign and date it, then scan it back into electronic form?  It would then have the required signature and date of review.  Still wastes a piece of paper but doesn’t create a paper mess.

 

Just asking; I use paper.

 

Mike Shane

Salem Media Group Omaha


Follow-Ups: RE: Operation Logs
(Mike Shane <mshane@salemomaha.com>, 8 Jul 2018 21:55:57 -0000)
RE: Operation Logs
("Thomas Cottle" <Tom@Faithradio.us>, 9 Jul 2018 16:50:42 -0000)
References: Operation Logs
(Tom Van Gorkom <tomvangorkom@gmail.com>, 6 Jul 2018 21:26:34 -0000)
Re: Operation Logs
(Mark Croom <markc@newmail.kinshipradio.org>, 7 Jul 2018 18:50:42 -0000)
RE: Operation Logs
(Mike Shane <mshane@salemomaha.com>, 7 Jul 2018 20:19:26 -0000)
Prev by date: Re: Operation Logs
(Tom Van Gorkom, 7 Jul 2018 21:29:55 -0000)
Next by date: Samsung Printer ML-1865W Driver
(harlanreinders, 7 Jul 2018 22:33:46 -0000)
Prev by thread: Re: Operation Logs
(Tom Van Gorkom, 7 Jul 2018 21:29:55 -0000)
Next by thread: RE: Operation Logs
(Mike Shane, 8 Jul 2018 21:55:57 -0000)
CRTech.org