[CRTech] Christian Radio Tech [MSG 83263]
[Thread Prev] [-- Thread Index --] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [-- Date Index --] [Date Next]
RE: Form 312 correction
To: "'CRTech'" <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: RE: Form 312 correction
From: "Cameron Beierle" <manager@kacs.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:15:50 -0700
Content-language: en-us
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kacs-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=reply-to:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:organization :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=pNyj62tuE4H5RHvgbKxXVlzohKts4CQliqs2Ie8eIeA=; b=nj1CRvf9YdwyLUWAldgL/OPxQq58VSNLXZaCGiSbSDeeMx1tVbHKJwPK9c69j6tYIa DPqWRAhFNw7bihtdPaDTXNuTAumN+pMqI8xHur07s6L+6cbfpDYDtH5Xyn+kRkU0oGVm ZwKDPUAe4gLMIGNnyaljJI/ClcVPk5i08kPzVwDoLGOVfkVhOsGEG1X5EqbiSRVb1nZa A//UsjTV8giZdwSJ3S2Fy1ozmYabV9EnAj8a4UIaB6jBwARZwT5VvqwK7KnD0+D+5PN9 b/vly0MSnHqJKm2BI+IIagCljWwAnFW/DoxSjNIoEIFoN/pCI+1aGRj7DgIshKRUbuI0 0YJg==
In-reply-to: <9a47f14e-e46a-4850-af17-31327b19a9e6@knlr.com>
Organization: KACS
References: <CALhX5z6UEZ3wT2T6mN_uxqYpk+nfP51ikr5TqMWeQGvt3vNKeQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM5PR20MB1977074DA40BA63CD444D5AFA44F0@DM5PR20MB1977.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <CALhX5z5NTtDvd1-ExNTO1OKy3X1TNzdVe=TWUJUgb2BQQ=bCYw@mail.gmail.com> <9a47f14e-e46a-4850-af17-31327b19a9e6@knlr.com>
Reply-to: <manager@kacs.org>
Thread-index: AdQPG/r8UGDWhjk3S5SoJsb2A0r6JgAAMFcQ

“I’m sure the satellite guys will set me straight…”


Or perhaps at an offset angle.







From: Terry Cowan [mailto:tcowan@knlr.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 1:09 PM
To: crtech@crtech.org
Subject: Re: [CRTech] Form 312 correction


360 -122.2637 = roughly 237.7.    122 is what we would measure from horizon to angle of look. But suppose the measuring starts 0 at a straight up look?  Then you would get 237.  I'm sure the satellite guys will set me straight.

Terry Cowan



On 06/28/18 12:57, Tim Roberts wrote:

At least they seem to be providing the answer they want...


On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Gregg Richwine <gmsnrich@live.com> wrote:

I was also contacted regarding correcting the angles. I haven't had time to go back and try to solve for their numbers versus the ones I calculated.


I have two more sites with dishes, and their corporate owners are doing a bulk filing, which is fine with me. :)


From: Tim Roberts <tim@kmocfm.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 2:45 PM
To: CRTech
Subject: [CRTech] Form 312 correction


Just an update on my FCC filing. Finally hear from them today. Submitted on the 6th of June.


I used a calculator SES suggested(http://www.rfwireless-world.com/calculators/Antenna-Elevation-Azimuth-Calculator.html) and the numbers they recommended ( ~70 - 140 W ). The FCC requested a correction on E58 and said the angle should be 237.7. I'm a bit confused on how they got that number.

This page of converters and calculators section covers Antenna Azimuth and Elevation calculator.It takes earth station longitude and latitude, satellite longitude and delivers antenna azimuth and elevation as outputs.


Latitude for our dish is 33.9014 or 33 54' 5.117"

Longitude is -98.5383 or 98 32' 17.92"


My answers on form 312:


E56: 135.7252

E57: 40.19167

E58 122.2637

E59 31.02769


Anyone mind helping me figure out where I was off?



Tim Roberts

Operations Director

89.5 KMOC Texoma





References: Form 312 correction
(Tim Roberts <tim@kmocfm.com>, 28 Jun 2018 19:45:59 -0000)
Re: Form 312 correction
(Gregg Richwine <gmsnrich@live.com>, 28 Jun 2018 19:53:40 -0000)
Re: Form 312 correction
(Tim Roberts <tim@kmocfm.com>, 28 Jun 2018 19:57:25 -0000)
Re: Form 312 correction
(Terry Cowan <tcowan@knlr.com>, 28 Jun 2018 20:09:53 -0000)
Prev by date: Re: Form 312 correction
(Terry Cowan, 28 Jun 2018 20:09:53 -0000)
Next by date: RE: Form 312 correction
(Cameron Beierle, 28 Jun 2018 20:31:31 -0000)
Prev by thread: Re: Form 312 correction
(Terry Cowan, 28 Jun 2018 20:09:53 -0000)
Next by thread: Re: Form 312 correction
(Tim Roberts, 28 Jun 2018 20:38:10 -0000)