[CRTech] Christian Radio Tech [MSG 82811]
[Thread Prev] [-- Thread Index --] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [-- Date Index --] [Date Next]
RE: Cablewave/RFS VS Andrew cable
To: CRTech <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: RE: Cablewave/RFS VS Andrew cable
From: Scott Todd <stodd@kloveair1.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 13:57:05 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=stodd@kloveair1.com;
Content-language: en-US
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=corpemf.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-kloveair1-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=mFU1L795VIKU1qr0Zm9F4ImBAioInja+6ILgp1Sc3GM=; b=TzIhQx/XlDkwYduqFPlr6QKQM5XTpPV6R1WN4RFBnMsvRSFnT0/9kjA9w3ZHVcb1pFA5IKCW6Nha0fLdv91tJkDRXvM3JB85EFaK0DsT6hrc6Rf+VF3C85O96j0IKBfL/MZCW7wTg81XUPEr+6D7avnOwWIjC+SjGvuiMKFl0Z4=
In-reply-to: <CACci8U78Xt8fEdgLdyNjBpMBhMPWqB6SpNoVXE6wPL5RSUux0A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACci8U78Xt8fEdgLdyNjBpMBhMPWqB6SpNoVXE6wPL5RSUux0A@mail.gmail.com>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Thread-index: AQHT4Ih7IlJNZ36e1UShFLyE/OELHqQZVOWA
Thread-topic: Cablewave/RFS VS Andrew cable

We’ve used mostly RFS in recent installations and haven’t had any problems with it.

 

Scott Todd

 

From: Dave Land [mailto:dave@klvv.com]

 

I'm looking for some 1 5/8" hardline and comparing Cablewave/RFS VS Andrew cable. What are your thoughts on those two brands? The  Cablewave/RFS is much cheaper, is it good cable?

References: Cablewave/RFS VS Andrew cable
(Dave Land <dave@klvv.com>, 30 Apr 2018 13:37:49 -0000)
Prev by date: Re: Cablewave/RFS VS Andrew cable
(Tom Van Gorkom, 30 Apr 2018 13:47:25 -0000)
Next by date: Re: Cablewave/RFS VS Andrew cable
(Kevin Kidd, 30 Apr 2018 14:00:25 -0000)
Prev by thread: Re: Cablewave/RFS VS Andrew cable
(Tom Van Gorkom, 30 Apr 2018 13:47:25 -0000)
Next by thread: Re: Cablewave/RFS VS Andrew cable
(Kevin Kidd, 30 Apr 2018 14:00:25 -0000)
CRTech.org