[CRTech] Christian Radio Tech [MSG 82731]
[Thread Prev] [-- Thread Index --] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [-- Date Index --] [Date Next]
Re: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
To: CRTech <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: Re: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
From: Mark Croom <markc@newmail.kinshipradio.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:55:32 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=newmail-kinshipradio-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jZXEdn3/eCBVm0+QJ7OX+BwW0aIiaPT86SEY/TlCHCw=; b=XX+mowakr/wLqZYYxdD0HqHl5a1/bMkGEmTHETl9RCKEd5aVurRV63M+J3tH6NQMdQ rKfGNT6cB6mGtt9nFclxC6SKl5K0/uDP3nPG5+ktTDnQq7TPuGWhplI6csk2diYmhucC +Yp0Gt9zBhLNXx/hTR28mRzVlYW366w9pfvejer9h2Bx6kvKWZhE2LSLcTCsS9JZevqc zZuw4yI42edAJC6aeiUB6kyVY6alXg8JG2ToWcT9elC5yX64R0JUqAP+KLd76L/so/ba T3+rengPfUZTolTnd1bv8FcIW5aR33AyVHy4A0YKYJl+0okqxMzkhEmai3+nHrQwef0W vSkQ==
In-reply-to: <005101d3dcab$6fb668a0$4f2339e0$@icloud.com>
References: <CAAthHBZBXWTdLRxSXhgciKCOeariGQkiSN0xgHZFbMMgCUDEoQ@mail.gmail.com> <e058b127-4f6d-941c-9de0-c4a6d04efdff@knlr.com> <332291e1-422a-08a0-9861-d6fffe8a9116@reyware.us> <835ec0ff-912d-a1e7-99a8-9b3306941381@bosscher.org> <DM5PR20MB19778FBA65414B3A6691B8E8A48F0@DM5PR20MB1977.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <005101d3dcab$6fb668a0$4f2339e0$@icloud.com>
Sorry but I'm not seeing where you are picking up the presumption that not doing PCN will hurt you in the long run.

If you're filed as using the band, you're filed as using the band in a given location (even if receive-only). I tend to think PCN was a foolish requirement for downlink stations anyway, they are really more important for stations that are doing uplink. Maybe there's some compelling tech reason I don't understand, but my perception is that the PCN requirement for downlink stations was just a hoop to jump through.

I can completely see it for sites doing uplink, though.

My perception from the information I've seen so far is that the waiver of the PCN requirement doesn't reduce your protection, it just allows users to file at a reasonable cost so the Commission, the proponents of the band sharing, and those who choose to comment in the proceeding have more accurate information about who is using the band.

I'm open to a more complete understanding, though.

I'm preparing to do about a dozen of these in the near future.

Mark


On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:38 AM, <nathaniel.steele@icloud.com> wrote:

So Let me be clear on things, It will cost money to file, if you file without PCN you have no protection from interference and if you do the PCN it cost’s more money but you will get protection from interference? EVEN if the FCC decides to let mobile broadband companies use the spectrum as well?

 

Correct me if I’m wrong because that’s the info that is left out of all the notices I”ve received from sources such as the BDR and TAB, etc….

 

Thaks!

 

From: Gregg Richwine <gmsnrich@live.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 10:23 PM
To: crtech@crtech.org
Subject: Re: [CRTech] SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018

 

Thanks again to Mark and Karen for giving a presentation to the Des Moines SBE chapter today! Nice to meet you two.

 

I filled out a registration form for one of my clients last year, along with the Comsearch report. I did a LOT of referring to the sample form, but we got it done, and sent it to their FCC counsel for review and filing. A receive-only tutorial will be a great help, because that form will be daunting to some.

 

Gregg Richwine

 


>Karen and Mark Johnson, CRTECH could use input on this. A note. The
>Johnson companies do offer down-link licensing. So yes, they might make
>enough to buy Karen new shoes (or maybe Mark?). But they are good
>friends of CRTech, and they have answers.





--
Mark W. Croom
Riverfront Communications, LLC
Yankton, SD
Follow-Ups: RE: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(nathaniel.steele@icloud.com, 25 Apr 2018 16:07:12 -0000)
References: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(Michael Barnes <barnmichael@gmail.com>, 24 Apr 2018 22:40:48 -0000)
Re: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(Terry Cowan <tcowan@knlr.com>, 24 Apr 2018 23:18:55 -0000)
Re: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(dave allen <crtech-mail@reyware.us>, 24 Apr 2018 23:32:50 -0000)
Re: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(Tom Bosscher <tom@bosscher.org>, 25 Apr 2018 00:15:38 -0000)
Re: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(Gregg Richwine <gmsnrich@live.com>, 25 Apr 2018 03:23:29 -0000)
RE: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(nathaniel.steele@icloud.com, 25 Apr 2018 15:38:30 -0000)
Prev by date: Re: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(Terry Cowan, 25 Apr 2018 15:50:04 -0000)
Next by date: RE: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(nathaniel . steele, 25 Apr 2018 16:07:12 -0000)
Prev by thread: RE: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(nathaniel . steele, 25 Apr 2018 15:38:30 -0000)
Next by thread: RE: SBE Regulatory Alert - Apr 23, 2018
(nathaniel . steele, 25 Apr 2018 16:07:12 -0000)
CRTech.org