[CRTech] Christian Radio Tech [MSG 81582]
[Thread Prev] [-- Thread Index --] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [-- Date Index --] [Date Next]
RE: FM Translators
To: CRTech <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: RE: FM Translators
From: Mike Shane <mshane@salemomaha.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:39:43 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=mshane@salemomaha.com;
Content-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <11b22f87-9baa-fa22-9d38-01db4003a60d@knlr.com>
References: <55D7DD7E-5F93-4418-9FD8-5A5F75C13AC0@gmail.com> <AB51A9A9EC341A479655F592221FE8BD770EC838@mbx028-e1-va-4.exch028.domain.local> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAADib6sS3YlVGmIoS9/eusAvCgAAAEAAAAK5ZRpgFPVxLiesu5ohNCmMBAAAAAA==@kacs.org> <AB51A9A9EC341A479655F592221FE8BD770ECD8D@mbx028-e1-va-4.exch028.domain.local> <a47aaabd21714b588a6be58bc6af3ee3@wilkinsradio.com> <BN6PR08MB3347D4AF09CE49D91A022316B5080@BN6PR08MB3347.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAPQBvqo0c7Jb4f2i8r1uSt9abQruLbGP=HDsYUuCDYeZJJU3RQ@mail.gmail.com> <BN6PR08MB33474D4C264F6DAA7A3B4A16B50E0@BN6PR08MB3347.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAOkhgWq+8JzRMFne9eVdt0ZAJvmMYSVe8GD46SPNZWdmqtFrTA@mail.gmail.com> <002601d379b7$12534720$36f9d560$@pilgrimradio.com> <11b22f87-9baa-fa22-9d38-01db4003a60d@knlr.com>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Thread-index: AQHTdcwMl/oEjyEpLk+tTC+Rmy6h0aNEwzsAgAAKcwCAABGFAIAAE8MAgAAxiuCABHT4gIAALaGQgAKdyYCAAB2bgIAAEJMAgAA9vDA=
Thread-topic: [CRTech] FM Translators

These are AM on FM translators so there is no baseband.  They get direct feeds from the studio. 

 

The “not real world” receiver being used for an air monitor is a ROLLS that is probably 10 years old but I don’t think any older.  We have 3.  The one listening to the one translator about a mile away is very happy with it.

 

I have a Bose radio in my car which doesn’t seem to like the mono audio at least without a stereo pilot.  It has no problem with the way-out-of-town auxiliary but the in-town translators drive it into distortion for some reason.  Only radio I know of that exhibits that behavior.  The ROLLS doesn’t and the chief’s in-truck radio doesn’t. 

 

I honestly didn’t know about them using DSP these days and I still have some radios from the 80’s (and one from the 70’s) that get fairly regular use!

 

Mike Shane

Salem Media Group Omaha

 

From: Terry Cowan [mailto:tcowan@knlr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 12:21 PM
To: crtech@crtech.org
Subject: Re: [CRTech] FM Translators

 

Simple cure is to take a feed from the baseband monitor which would be a mono output

Terry Cowan

KNLR/KNLX

 

On 12/20/17 09:21, Bill Hurne wrote:

You say your auxiliary FM has noisy stereo on your studio air monitor.   That monitor most likely has no “blend to mono”, so it isn’t a real world receiver.   Most real world receivers that listeners are using have auto “blend to mono” and DSP as Willie mentions that greatly reduces stereo noise.

 

Bill

 

 

From: Willie Barnett [mailto:wbradiolists@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 7:36 AM
To: CRTech
Subject: Re: [CRTech] FM Translators

 

Since they started using DSP in modern radios (1990's?) this hasn't been an issue, ESPECIALLY in cars. :) (Which is where MOST stereo listening happens nowadays.)

I haven't heard the noise level effect of stereo vs mono reception on any consumer stereo receiver for a good long time, now. (Unless the stereo is OLD!)

Chances are, MOST at-home listening is on a mono radio, anyway. (Clock radio, table radio, etc.)

 

Willie...

 

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Mike Shane <mshane@salemomaha.com> wrote:

Thank you for that input, Mark.  I neglected to include the fact that we run both our translators as mono.  We are laboring under what we think is true, that running in mono will clean up noise level in marginal signal areas.  Have an auxiliary FM that runs in mono and it makes a big difference in the studio air monitor compared to stereo.

 

Willing to listen to contrary arguments about the mono/stereo thing.  I find it is not without issues on the translators but not so much on the FM Aux.

 

Mike Shane

Salem Media Group Omaha

 

Follow-Ups: Re: FM Translators
(Terry Cowan <tcowan@knlr.com>, 20 Dec 2017 22:54:40 -0000)
References: FM Translators
(KGBA Radio <kgbaradio@gmail.com>, 15 Dec 2017 17:42:04 -0000)
RE: FM Translators
(Jack Epperson <Jack.Epperson@alphamediausa.com>, 15 Dec 2017 19:03:52 -0000)
RE: FM Translators
("Cameron Beierle" <manager@kacs.org>, 15 Dec 2017 19:41:09 -0000)
RE: FM Translators
(Jack Epperson <Jack.Epperson@alphamediausa.com>, 15 Dec 2017 20:43:51 -0000)
Re: FM Translators
(Tyger Elton <tyger@wilkinsradio.com>, 15 Dec 2017 21:54:39 -0000)
RE: FM Translators
(Mike Shane <mshane@salemomaha.com>, 16 Dec 2017 01:05:32 -0000)
Re: FM Translators
(Mark Croom <markc@newmail.kinshipradio.org>, 18 Dec 2017 20:55:36 -0000)
RE: FM Translators
(Mike Shane <mshane@salemomaha.com>, 18 Dec 2017 23:43:13 -0000)
Re: FM Translators
(Willie Barnett <wbradiolists@gmail.com>, 20 Dec 2017 15:36:09 -0000)
RE: FM Translators
("Bill Hurne" <billhurne@pilgrimradio.com>, 20 Dec 2017 17:22:31 -0000)
Re: FM Translators
(Terry Cowan <tcowan@knlr.com>, 20 Dec 2017 18:21:34 -0000)
Prev by date: Re: FM Translators
(Bill Tidwell, 20 Dec 2017 20:47:14 -0000)
Next by date: Re: FM Translators
(Terry Cowan, 20 Dec 2017 22:54:40 -0000)
Prev by thread: Re: FM Translators
(Terry Cowan, 20 Dec 2017 18:21:34 -0000)
Next by thread: Re: FM Translators
(Terry Cowan, 20 Dec 2017 22:54:40 -0000)
CRTech.org