[CRTech] Christian Radio Tech [MSG 79519]
[Thread Prev] [-- Thread Index --] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [-- Date Index --] [Date Next]
RE: FTP and 44.1
To: CRTech <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: RE: FTP and 44.1
From: Alan Kilgore <wrvm.engineer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:31:55 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:from:date:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=tkLz0LbD6FTfe0REdo7BZRVbSbJdcoZ+XN18oLWGFlk=; b=kxIwTFwoL3FYzL67lTW6hPsDqmq5W99Ihrnf/L2cY5IjFxFZc8lpOCUGYQHJyiA/DN pdxlBxTYTyvGFzCJYL1tGwBImtfjiiRw0gu5tRGr4l1/UxGWUjkzOIJqoJlerX1zwi7U 6cF8hWYi8ZwoYTc3ZzdBPmI7e1X76VvYo7/xhrCwH2dzlBNRcq/lzt0kNOdwmzbztXPi ffonAy1S4wMQfbk2EyIjlMM8PWk3Z5U+YFeeXsnRq82q48yv+FWew4BWUE8rvwTcmzC6 Mt+yfXJ2YPi34Hoji49eLX9CUosQMAR8rqwWsX6hYu91bErECkhzPBGBgAm8TcD3Vaoe v45g==
In-reply-to: <895b028fcccd405a90bb5c1c3a7368b5@KAMBSERVER.KAMB.local>
References: <cd5aeff9c8674b388430ddf11253b3c7@KAMBSERVER.KAMB.local> <CANw35DkZgfHgzpRDX3uFG24GqpBYzLPUxi+mhPLD8C6gtLj6HA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOkhgWr4iV-2NC-0k9jmMWGn7XgfObyuz_PuLyEkgNyhQXN1=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAAthHBa6d-Uxp2teNe8cY-9Zxoc97K5AuvK16UQKW23ZeB2o7Q@mail.gmail.com> <895b028fcccd405a90bb5c1c3a7368b5@KAMBSERVER.KAMB.local>
I believe it would be more accurate to state that 48 is a broadcast standard audio rate when used with broadcast video media and both 44.1 and 48 are broadcast standards for broadcast audio media; IMHO.  :)
____________________________________
Alan Kilgore, CPBE
WRVM Chief Engineer

At 02:17 PM 4/12/2017, you wrote:
Who decided that 44.1 was a "consumer" standard and 48 was "professional"? The difference in audio quality would be very slight at best.
 
 
Mark Murdock
Production Director
KAMB
References: FTP and 44.1
(Mark Murdock <mark@celebrationradio.com>, 6 Apr 2017 17:11:38 -0000)
Re: FTP and 44.1
(Mark McMillan <mhmcmillan@gmail.com>, 6 Apr 2017 17:43:31 -0000)
Re: FTP and 44.1
(Willie Barnett <wbradiolists@gmail.com>, 12 Apr 2017 13:43:33 -0000)
Re: FTP and 44.1
(Michael Barnes <barnmichael@gmail.com>, 12 Apr 2017 18:56:21 -0000)
RE: FTP and 44.1
(Mark Murdock <mark@celebrationradio.com>, 12 Apr 2017 19:18:01 -0000)
Prev by date: RE: FTP and 44.1
(Mark Murdock, 12 Apr 2017 19:18:01 -0000)
Next by date: RE: FTP and 44.1
(Nathaniel Steele, 12 Apr 2017 19:41:35 -0000)
Prev by thread: RE: FTP and 44.1
(Mark Murdock, 12 Apr 2017 19:18:01 -0000)
Next by thread: RE: FTP and 44.1
(Nathaniel Steele, 12 Apr 2017 19:41:35 -0000)
CRTech.org