[CRTech] Christian Radio Tech [MSG 79326]
[Thread Prev] [-- Thread Index --] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [-- Date Index --] [Date Next]
Re: Barix as backup STL
To: CRTech <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: Re: Barix as backup STL
From: Jim McDermott <jim@spiritfm.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:20:26 -0500
In-reply-to: <CAK3sGGEU7C-qrEm2wQkeU-LA6PPoS8mteHpb1=3pNzMynmgS3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHfeBv1=2YLbH5dnSbj+_=0Xogu4D3pxvuCK5wnqLB8fYR7tQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACci8U7iypBnPKf1=db_fQfk5xC65P6DWNZqxMjsJFKSsAOJ3A@mail.gmail.com> <001b01d2a8a3$92fa79b0$b8ef6d10$@pilgrimradio.com> <CAK3sGGEU7C-qrEm2wQkeU-LA6PPoS8mteHpb1=3pNzMynmgS3A@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
I actually use Barix for STL's and I just set them to pick up my regular station AAC+ stream. At 48k, they sound acceptable to broadcast and I don't have to push a signal to them. If I had the money, I'd use Tielines everywhere, but $350 for one extremer versus $3000 for a pair of Bridge-IT's makes the Barix boxes a good choice. We have silence sensors on them that reboot them if they go offline for more than 90 secs.

--
Jim McDermott
President, Lake Area Educ Broadcasting
Spirit FM Radio & The Pulse Channel

Lake of the Ozarks, MO
www.spiritfm.org -- www.pulsechannel.org




On 3/30/2017 9:00 AM, Chris Wygal wrote:
What Bill said. Exactly.

We're in the middle of looking at a backup IP path, and considering codec options. We have a stack of Barix boxes lying around from old projects, but I'm still hesitant to use them...

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Bill Hurne <billhurne@pilgrimradio.com> wrote:

The Barix work, but we found the extra expense of the Comrex BRIC-Link gives better performance than the low cost Barix.   The BRIC-Links have better buffering and pass audio more cleanly during times of poor internet connection or congestion.   The Barix audio has more tendency to break up during poor connections.

 

Bill

 

 

From: Dave Land [mailto:dave@klvv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 6:52 AM
To: CRTech
Subject: Re: [CRTech] Barix as backup STL

 

Also take a look at Comrex BRIC-Link. We have found them to be very good. NO problems for years (so far).

Dave

Chief Engineer

The Love Station, inc

 

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, BIll Moede <bmoedereplay@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm looking to put together a backup STL system for use over an IP / Internet connection.  For those of you with experience with Barix, are these the two pieces I would need;   Barix Instreamer and a Barix Exstremer 100.

 

Thanks,

 




--
--
Chris Wygal
Audio Concepts <------side gig
Audio Production,Mixing & Mastering
@ChrisWygal

Radio Magazine <-----writing gig
www.radiomagonline.com


The Journey <------full time gig
Operations Manager
www.myjourneyfm.com


c: 434.420-1122
o: 434-582-2995
 
 
 



Follow-Ups: Re: Barix as backup STL
(Kevin Trueblood <kevin@neptuneradio.net>, 30 Mar 2017 14:58:52 -0000)
References: Barix as backup STL
(BIll Moede <bmoedereplay@gmail.com>, 28 Mar 2017 16:21:00 -0000)
Re: Barix as backup STL
(Dave Land <dave@klvv.com>, 29 Mar 2017 13:51:49 -0000)
RE: Barix as backup STL
("Bill Hurne" <billhurne@pilgrimradio.com>, 29 Mar 2017 15:46:17 -0000)
Re: Barix as backup STL
(Chris Wygal <cmwygal@gmail.com>, 30 Mar 2017 14:00:13 -0000)
Prev by date: RE: Barix as backup STL
(Brigitte Sylvestre, 30 Mar 2017 14:02:56 -0000)
Next by date: Re: Barix as backup STL
(Kevin Trueblood, 30 Mar 2017 14:58:52 -0000)
Prev by thread: RE: Barix as backup STL
(Brigitte Sylvestre, 30 Mar 2017 14:02:56 -0000)
Next by thread: Re: Barix as backup STL
(Kevin Trueblood, 30 Mar 2017 14:58:52 -0000)
CRTech.org