[CRTech] Christian Radio Tech [MSG 79325]
[Thread Prev] [-- Thread Index --] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [-- Date Index --] [Date Next]
RE: Barix as backup STL
To: CRTech <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: RE: Barix as backup STL
From: Brigitte Sylvestre <brigitte.sylvestre@moody.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:02:31 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is smtp.mailfrom=moody.edu; crtech.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;crtech.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=moody.edu;
Content-language: en-US
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=moodybibleinstitute.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-moody-edu; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=0dAYtz7LR4hLr19u+GZSF8NC/+GoODb8pL5p3YNJYcg=; b=nnEcpzT1Mze+z+9C/mciL2N0w8HAjn0Knk5CCnOYFPj21+CGgkuAA6x7lgMNvzCUiMiOy8qWg+N17pa9/2h+NcvReJBM/a0FHAjOJtYfkavZM2QBfBik0RbpByVoxPrCnFat+REiTzjaoRq0B79yDYL1EEpgvUoqGdl222FRkfw=
In-reply-to: <CAK3sGGEU7C-qrEm2wQkeU-LA6PPoS8mteHpb1=3pNzMynmgS3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHfeBv1=2YLbH5dnSbj+_=0Xogu4D3pxvuCK5wnqLB8fYR7tQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACci8U7iypBnPKf1=db_fQfk5xC65P6DWNZqxMjsJFKSsAOJ3A@mail.gmail.com> <001b01d2a8a3$92fa79b0$b8ef6d10$@pilgrimradio.com> <CAK3sGGEU7C-qrEm2wQkeU-LA6PPoS8mteHpb1=3pNzMynmgS3A@mail.gmail.com>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Thread-index: AQHSqJOX+RY7KWeFy0mez88+6dpvt6Gtas/6gAAAKnA=
Thread-topic: [CRTech] Barix as backup STL


I would like help being removed from CR Tech. Because of a shift in responsibilities, it is no longer necessary for me to receive these emails.

I tried, unsuccessfully to be removed.

If I can get help from the moderator, that would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you!


From: Chris Wygal [mailto:cmwygal@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 10:00 AM
To: CRTech <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: Re: [CRTech] Barix as backup STL


What Bill said. Exactly.

We're in the middle of looking at a backup IP path, and considering codec options. We have a stack of Barix boxes lying around from old projects, but I'm still hesitant to use them...


On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Bill Hurne <billhurne@pilgrimradio.com> wrote:

The Barix work, but we found the extra expense of the Comrex BRIC-Link gives better performance than the low cost Barix.   The BRIC-Links have better buffering and pass audio more cleanly during times of poor internet connection or congestion.   The Barix audio has more tendency to break up during poor connections.





From: Dave Land [mailto:dave@klvv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 6:52 AM
To: CRTech
Subject: Re: [CRTech] Barix as backup STL


Also take a look at Comrex BRIC-Link. We have found them to be very good. NO problems for years (so far).


Chief Engineer

The Love Station, inc


On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, BIll Moede <bmoedereplay@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm looking to put together a backup STL system for use over an IP / Internet connection.  For those of you with experience with Barix, are these the two pieces I would need;   Barix Instreamer and a Barix Exstremer 100.






Chris Wygal

Audio Concepts <------side gig

Audio Production,Mixing & Mastering

Radio Magazine <-----writing gig

The Journey <------full time gig
Operations Manager

c: 434.420-1122

o: 434-582-2995




References: Barix as backup STL
(BIll Moede <bmoedereplay@gmail.com>, 28 Mar 2017 16:21:00 -0000)
Re: Barix as backup STL
(Dave Land <dave@klvv.com>, 29 Mar 2017 13:51:49 -0000)
RE: Barix as backup STL
("Bill Hurne" <billhurne@pilgrimradio.com>, 29 Mar 2017 15:46:17 -0000)
Re: Barix as backup STL
(Chris Wygal <cmwygal@gmail.com>, 30 Mar 2017 14:00:13 -0000)
Prev by date: Re: Barix as backup STL
(Chris Wygal, 30 Mar 2017 14:00:13 -0000)
Next by date: Re: Barix as backup STL
(Jim McDermott, 30 Mar 2017 14:21:04 -0000)
Prev by thread: Re: Barix as backup STL
(Chris Wygal, 30 Mar 2017 14:00:13 -0000)
Next by thread: Re: Barix as backup STL
(Jim McDermott, 30 Mar 2017 14:21:04 -0000)