[CRTech] Christian Radio Tech [MSG 79127]
[Thread Prev] [-- Thread Index --] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [-- Date Index --] [Date Next]
Re: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
To: CRTech <crtech@crtech.org>
Subject: Re: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
From: Sherrod Munday <smunday@ieee.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:08:23 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=XkAoNFt4d5nVUDW3fTxG8OcgOBC6ZA/AHfbCjvHOjMA=; b=UiS8Y8IGjDdp+Dizc+Hb+CrDwhKEbf02GbTfulMv+3YS1b6AGG9czYIII1Gi0ikrsU sAIHribOAXH31xEH8ioXl5vu4CKOwv01r2QQxFjDB1WhXHGJKhz3th9xdRqUaJywNax0 W7U5Dx6Xlh53NUpSSp+f0WD6L7x4dvvRcJtNpe341ZECfop4FbAwQViaArNPgMbZHgAg ERTLlU6XVOYe5dhA01wH/iNG8cT4q3wtaClaPlzNOSKMYQ9lz4/xuPfgG6UEB5EfCb1Z Qr+l2aemkKwIIUartYrbIdQBh42/W+YpX8Vl5vl/ic4/qXx3OTWxP3JpnDBBUYqx8Eov FCiQ==
In-reply-to: <CAPQBvqoRuR=tUCQAjwd09T0CcQAA5KHy6XCdMAQ1uNZBPmD2fQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA8ua=zsPLmxA9OneexoZzcoB8j4hZyekxF_hXtgpnmvH2w2VA@mail.gmail.com> <C75A7180-E0C0-436E-964B-3FF56541A105@ieee.org> <CAA8ua=w6WpQZv7RrkyVuY8TfCLO6mnx1tuJHHFSAXMLZaUcQPA@mail.gmail.com> <4CADC9E2-E6EC-46F0-80AD-3A87EF962A96@ieee.org> <CAPQBvqoRuR=tUCQAjwd09T0CcQAA5KHy6XCdMAQ1uNZBPmD2fQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mar 10, 2017, at 17:51, Mark Croom <markc@newmail.kinshipradio.org> wrote:
> It may have been your recommendation that led me to use Imagestream Transport routers for some T1 P2P WAN links for my previous employer. ...
> Great routers, but not simple to configure by any means. 

I wholeheartedly agree.  I actually had that in my prior email, but cut it out to focus more on the concept of "you get what you pay for".  That really should be the take-away message I wanted to highlight.


To your point, Imagestream's user interface is anything but kid-friendly, and I've had two Microsoft IT admins (who worked for me in the past) both look at the Imagestream and give up after spending a while trying to figure it out.  (To be fair, neither one was a Linux sysadmin, and neither was really interested in learning that OS/platform -- and neither was a real networking guy, either.)

You're absolutely right, though -- as I was going to write previously, "Imagestream routers are not for the faint of heart."

But neither is it easy to fly a Boeing 747 or an F-35 fighter plane.  Both are incredibly complex and require extensive training and practice, and they're far more useful than a Cessna -- for a specific purpose.
—
Sherrod Munday
<smunday@ieee.org>

Follow-Ups: Re: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
(Mark Croom <markc@newmail.kinshipradio.org>, 10 Mar 2017 23:17:08 -0000)
References: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
(Pat Wahl <pwahl@wwib.com>, 10 Mar 2017 19:56:18 -0000)
Re: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
(Sherrod Munday <smunday@ieee.org>, 10 Mar 2017 20:15:02 -0000)
Re: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
(Pat Wahl <pwahl@wwib.com>, 10 Mar 2017 20:28:34 -0000)
Re: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
(Sherrod Munday <smunday@ieee.org>, 10 Mar 2017 22:31:11 -0000)
Re: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
(Mark Croom <markc@newmail.kinshipradio.org>, 10 Mar 2017 22:51:17 -0000)
Prev by date: Re: Cellphones on air flight - was Comrex Remote Connections
(Michael Barnes, 10 Mar 2017 23:07:46 -0000)
Next by date: RE: Re Unity 4000
(Shan Easterling, 10 Mar 2017 23:09:07 -0000)
Prev by thread: Re: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
(Mark Croom, 10 Mar 2017 22:51:17 -0000)
Next by thread: Re: inexpensive but reliable Internet router - does it exist?
(Mark Croom, 10 Mar 2017 23:17:08 -0000)
CRTech.org